Compliance · NIS 2 · DORA

NIS 2 and DORA: from paper compliance to demonstrable resilience

Regulators now expect more than policies and periodic audits: they require proof that controls work, that third parties are under control and that the organisation can withstand a real attack. Our technologies and managed services help implement, measure and demonstrate these requirements.

WHAT IS CHANGING

Compliance becomes a matter of proof

Yesterday

  • Security policies
  • Periodic audits
  • Paper compliance

With NIS 2 and DORA

  • Demonstrable resilience
  • Continuous risk management
  • Third‑party oversight
  • Validation of control effectiveness
  • Direct accountability of management
NIS 2 · ANSSI ReCyF FRAMEWORK

20 objectives and 152 requirements

23

Governance

  • Objectives 1 to 4
  • IT inventory, governance framework, ecosystem control, security and HR
70

Protection

  • Objectives 5 to 11
  • IT control, architecture, remote access, malware, identity and access, administration
28

Defence and resilience

  • Objectives 12 to 15
  • Incidents, continuity and recovery, cyber crises, exercises and tests
31

Essential entities

  • Objectives 16 to 20
  • Risk‑based approach, audits, secure configuration, dedicated administration, monitoring

Important entity: 76 applicable requirements. Essential entity: all 152, including objectives 16 to 20 in full. Source: ANSSI, ReCyF v2.5 of 17/03/2026 (working version).

NIS 2 · CONTRIBUTION OF OUR TECHNOLOGIES

Up to 71% of requirements covered

Share of the ReCyF requirements for an important entity (76 requirements) covered, strongly or partially, by our technologies. Each technology added increases coverage.

Networking and security (SASE)
39,5 %
+ Identity protection
59,2 %
All 5 technologies
71,1 %
110requirements covered out of 152 for an essential entity
50strongly covered
60partially covered
42are organisational matters: governance, continuity, physical access, HR. We help structure them

Source: SASETY mapping against the ANSSI ReCyF v2.5 (17/03/2026, working version).

NIS 2 · EACH TECHNOLOGY IN ITS FIELD

Contribution by technology

Number of ReCyF requirements (out of 152) each technology contributes to. The same requirement can be covered by several technologies, so the figures do not add up.

27 strong · 32 partial

Converged networking and security (SASE)

  • Segmentation and filtering (7)
  • Encrypted remote access (8)
  • Authorised devices (9)
  • Administration network (19)
  • Detection and isolation (12, 14)
22 strong · 31 partial

Identity security

  • Identities, MFA and reviews (10)
  • Administration accounts and directory (11)
  • Administration workstations (19)
  • MFA for remote access (8)
4 strong · 14 partial

Email and human factor

  • Awareness (4)
  • Attachment analysis (9)
  • User reports (12)
  • Archiving and continuity (13, 14)
3 strong · 10 partial

Anti-ransomware protection

  • Malware and ransomware (9)
  • Incident response (12)
  • Recovery after encryption (13, 14)
7 strong · 25 partial

Security validation

  • Automated penetration tests (17)
  • Exercises and tests (15)
  • Password strength (10)
  • Action plan follow‑up (2, 16)

In brackets: ReCyF objective number. Source: SASETY mapping against the ANSSI ReCyF v2.5.

DORA · FINANCIAL SECTOR

From compliance to operational resilience

DORA rests on two major requirements, which largely overlap with NIS 2: governance, risk management, incident reporting, third‑party management, security testing and resilience validation.

Test resilience

  • Regular validation of security controls
  • Operational resilience testing
  • Ability to withstand a real attack

Control third‑party risk

  • Cloud providers and software vendors
  • IT providers and outsourced critical services
  • Contractual requirements for ICT providers

What we bring

  • Continuous security validation and evidence for audits
  • 24/7 monitoring, incident management and reporting
  • Continuity: backup mail service, recovery after ransomware
  • DORA addenda for our ICT services
HOW TO READ IT

A measured contribution, separate from any certification

Strong

  • Once configured, the feature contributes strongly to the technical implementation of the requirement

Partial

  • It contributes, covers part of the scope or provides evidence

Outside scope

  • The requirement relates to organisation, documents or resources outside the scope

Where do you stand on NIS 2 and DORA? Let's review it together.